Written by: Rick Staggenborg, MD on May 26, 2010 7:15 AM PDT
This essay is dedicated to Edwin Abbott Abbott, the English schoolmaster, theologian and acute social commentarian who wrote the novella Flatland in 1884. This little gem was many things but to me it was primarily an introduction into thinking about multidimensionality. I have found this an invaluable tool for speculating about the interface between science and faith.
As the Dalai Lama pointed out recently, the end of war requires a faith that transcends any one religion. One has to have faith in the essential goodness of men and women to have the faith that we are capable of governing ourselves. To reject the concept that man is inherently evil is to accept the essential assumption of democracy. This is the underlying premise in the message of Vishnu, Krishna, Buddha, many Old Testament prophets, Christ and Mohammed in their admonition to love our neighbors as ourselves or as members of our family.
Just because scientists know more about their areas of specialty than we do, we do not need to accept the prevailing paradigms in constructing the model of reality we create for ourselves that allows us to make what passes for sense in the world we share with others. However, it requires an unusually keen sense of what is important in our seemingly chaotic world to begin to perceive the patterns of events that may be clues to the existence of the higher planes of existence which are the only place where reality can conceivably be directly experienced.
Only through the rigorous application of logic is it possible to develop a truly coherent world view. The time required to study and reflect on the models of reality that scientists have developed and the effort that this takes makes it unachievable for all but the most dedicated student of life. We must learn how to sort "common sense" and appeal to authority from ideas that do not depend on granting undue authority to ideas that are merely popular with society or even the community of scientists in a field.
While it is more logical to suspect that the body of scientists who support a given theory are more likely to be right than the dissenter, we have to remember that Einstein was not accepted at first because so few of the scientists of his day were able to understand his theories. Only when they made testable predictions that proved true despite violating "common sense" were his ideas universally accepted. Even so, Einstein himself refused to accept the possibility that events in space-time are probabilistic rather than deterministic.
The “wise” Sphere who materializes in front of him moves through four-dimensional time-space in synchronicity with the changing perspectives of Square. Thus, as Sphere moved through the plane of Flatland, Square first saw a point in front of him, then a gradually widening circle that grew to a maximum size before vanishing. Sphere used this graphic demonstration to provide the clues in the three dimensional time-space the consciousness of Square inhabited that could be used to deduce the literal and demonstrable existence of a fourth dimension not be directly perceivable from three dimensions.
Since Flatlanders only conceived of the world in two dimensions, they could not imagine what it meant to live in three dimensions of space. Only by recognizing the significance of the clues to the existence of a higher plane inhabited by sentient creatures could Square understand the reality of the three dimensions of his direct experience.
The Hindus contemplated this and concluded that there were seven states of consciousness. Some religionists believe that the stages of enlightenment through which our consciousness evolves over time play out in succeeding life cycles and take as long as is required for the individual soul to realize that there is nothing worth pursuing in life but enlightenment. Today we may be entering the Age of Aquarius, when the idea suddenly dawns in our collective consciousness that the end of war is possible if we collectively will it to be so.
If this is the nature of the Universe, then each of us contains a part of answer to the puzzle of the nature of God and its "plan." In a universe where free will exists our future is not determined for us, though it may be known to God. It is up to us to collectively choose the path that we take together at each of the various nexus points between an infinity of potential "realities" within the multiverse.
If Buddha was right, then all things that occur in the material universe are inter-related and interdependent, as modern physicists now believe to be the case. Just as joy cannot be perceived by those who have not known pain, the path to the salvation of the our planet cannot be envisioned until we have glimpsed a vision of Hell on Earth. Armageddon is the vision of that Hell that some imagine awaits us.
Their complacency threatens to make the warning of Armageddon a self-fulfilling prophecy. If God gave us free will, then it is up to us to choose the path we will take individually and collectively. I choose to challenge this dark vision of the fate of humanity and fight to prevent it with the gathering Army of the Soldiers For Peace internationally.
In such a world, a cube appears as we see it from four dimensions only when viewed from certain angles, just as a cube would appear a square to us if viewed end-on from angles which can be predicted from simple geometry. Viewed from other angles in five dimensions, we would see a multidimensional view of the cube that would reveal its true nature in such a universe. It would be seen to be what mathematicians call a hypercube. To consider how to end war through playing the game of life and death in n-dimensional space-time, we must learn to think outside of the hypercube.
With apologies to Laura Nyro:
I'm not scared of dying
and I don't really care.
If it's peace you find in dying
well then, let the time be near.
If it's peace you find in dying,
well then dying time is near.
Just bundle up my coffin,
'cause it's cold way down there.
I hear that it's cold way down there yeah,
crazy cold, way down there.
And when I die, and when I'm gone
there'll be one child born
in this world
to carry on, to carry on.
Now troubles are many
they’re as deep as a well.
I believe that we’ll make Heaven
‘cause I don’t believe in Hell.
I’ll pray that we’ll bring Heaven
and I don’t believe in Hell.
But I'll never know while livin’,
only my dyin' will tell.
Yes only my dyin' will tell oh yeah,
only my dyin' will tell.
And when I die, and when I'm gone,
there'll be one child born in this world
to carry on, to carry on
yeah, yeah.
Give me my freedom
for as long as I be.
All I ask of livin'
is to have no chains on me.
All I ask of livin'
is to have no chains on me.
And all I ask of dyin' is to
go natrually, only wanna
go naturally
Here I go!
hey, hey.
Here come the devil
right behind.
Look out children, here he come.
Here he come, heyyy.
Don't wanna go by the devil.
don't wanna go by the demon.
don't wanna go by Satan,
don't wanna die uneasy.
Just let me go
naturally.
And when I die, and when I'm dead,
dead and gone,
there'll be
one child born, in our world
to carry on, to carry on.
Rick Staggenborg, MD
Roseburg, Oregon
At this point in the book I have outlined a theory of God, Mankind and the relationships between and among them that I hope will intrigue both believers in the various religions, those of a nebulous spiritual bent agnostics and even atheists, which I regard as a fundamentalist religion.
ReplyDeleteMy theory is consistent with known science in the 21st Century and thus not dependent on what atheists consider "superstition." Perhaps some would say that it is really a set of hypotheses, but I have laid out elsewhere in this book how one might perform the experiments that can prove conclusively to the individual of the validity of the theory, if not the reality of the model it proposes.
I encourage readers of this book who have skipped around to read or reread the essay What if God Were All of Us? before passing judgment on the validity of the postulates described in that and this essay.